Since its launch in 2017, the IAB’s ads.txt initiative has brought increased transparency into the programmatic advertising ecosystem of sellers and domains.
One of the primary goals of the ads.txt program is to reduce counterfeit inventory, or domain spoofing — a specific type of ad fraud and invalid traffic (IVT). Domain spoofing occurs when a domain is misrepresented during a programmatic ad transaction — e.g. a low-quality publisher claiming to be a high-quality publisher. Spoofing makes the inventory appear more valuable, and this type of ad fraud costs marketers millions of dollars per year.
Ads.txt launched one year ago, and now that the majority of major publishers have implemented ads.txt, it’s time to review the initiative’s impact on ad fraud.
(Click here to download the full Q2 2018 Ads.txt Trends Report)
Ads.txt and ad fraud: Sites with ads.txt have 10% lower IVT rates
Pixalate analyzed industry-wide ads.txt data for our Q2 2018 Ads.txt Trends Report and found that, on average, sites with ads.txt have a 10% lower ad fraud rate compared to sites without ads.txt.
- April: 12.9% ad fraud on sites without ads.txt vs. 11.8% on sites with ads.txt (8.8% decrease)
- May: 13.2% vs. 12.8% (3% decrease)
- June: 17.1% vs. 14.5% (15% decrease)
- Q2 2018 total: 14.53% vs. 13.08% (10% decrease)
What does this ads.txt data mean?
- Ads.txt helps reduce ad fraud...
- Our data shows that sites with ads.txt, on average, have a consistently lower overall ad fraud rate than sites without ads.txt. The overall improvement in quality is part of the reason why some agencies are moving to ads.txt-only buying.
- …but ads.txt doesn’t eradicate all ad fraud
- Despite the fact that sites with ads.txt have generally lower ad fraud rates compared to non-ads.txt sites, the “protected” sites still had ad fraud rates over 13% in the time period we examined. Even with widespread support of an industry-wide initiative like ads.txt, ad fraud remains a extensive problem.
Our Q2 2018 data indicates that the positive impact of ads.txt may be growing, as evidenced by June’s 15% decrease, but more data over time is needed to confirm.
How does ads.txt reduce ad fraud?
Ads.txt was designed to reduce “domain spoofing” in the open programmatic marketplace. Spoofing occurs when a domain is misrepresented during a programmatic ad transaction. Fraudsters can “spoof” premium publishers to make inventory appear more valuable.
Domain spoofing is a costly problem for marketers. The Financial Times investigated domain spoofing of their inventory — e.g. fraudsters claiming to be FT.com — and found that over $1.3 million worth of fraudulent inventory was traded per month.
Ads.txt directly protects against domain spoofing by enabling publishers to declare the companies that are authorized to sell their digital inventory. Each publisher’s ads.txt file serves as a public ledger that buyers can cross-reference to ensure that the inventory they are buying will go to the claimed domain.
Why doesn’t ads.txt remove all ad fraud?
As our data shows, even though sites with ads.txt have generally lower IVT rates, they are not fraud-free.
A major reason why is because ads.txt protects against just one type of ad fraud (domain spoofing). Pixalate tracks 38 unique types of ad fraud; there are still many other ways in which fraudsters are stealing budgets.
Bad intenders can also create ads.txt files on fraudulent domains to appear more legitimate. For example, Pixalate discovered a family of domains that hijacked sessions without malware, and many of the fraudulent domains had ads.txt files.
Additionally, ads.txt does not work across all formats, including mobile in-app. The IAB Tech Lab released a draft for public comment regarding mobile in-app ads.txt support in June 2018.
Learn more about ads.txt
You can download the full list of domains with ads.txt here. This list is updated monthly.
You can also download our Q2 2018 Ads.txt Trends Report for a comprehensive update on the state of ads.txt adoption.
Want more data-driven insights? Sign up for our blog!